No. The Canadian Standards Association (CSA) does NOT certify or approve individual makes, styles or models of respirators for use or sale in Canada. The CSA accepts NIOSH certification or approval of respirators for use in the occupational setting.

The Canadian Standards Association (CSA) has prepared and published a standard which provides guidance for use of respirators. CSA Z94.4 standard - Selection Care and Use of Respirators, specifies requirements for the selection, care and use of respirators. The purpose is to protect workers from known or potential respiratory hazards in their environment. The standard also outlines components for an effective respiratory program. The standard does not address the selection of respirators for use against infectious agents or nuclear, biological or chemical agents.

NIOSH certifies three types of disposable particulate filters with three levels of filter efficiency, 95%, 99% and 99.97%, in each class. All filters are tested by utilizing the most penetrating aerosol size 0.3 micron (aerodynamic mass median diameter).

N-series (Not for oils), tested against a mildly degrading aerosol of sodium chloride (NaCl) and effective filtration of particulates aerosols free of oils
R-series (somewhat Resistant to oil), tested against a highly degrading aerosol dioctytphalate (DOP) and "somewhat" effective filtration of particulates in an oil-mist/aerosol
P-series (strongly resistant oil Proof), tested against a highly degrading aerosol dioctytphalate (DOP) and effective filtration of particulates in an oil-mist/ aerosol

The N95 designation means that the filter medium has a filtration efficiency of at least 95% (i.e. will allow no more than 5% particle penetration) against particles that are 0.3 microns in size. That means that 5 out of every 100 airborne particles can penetrate the filter medium and enter the wearer's breathing zone. T

he N99 designation means that the filter medium has a filtration efficiency of at least 99% (i.e. will allow no more than 1% particle penetration) against particles that are 0.3 microns in size. That means that less than 1 out of every 100 airborne particles can penetrate the filter medium and enter the breathing zone. In comparison to the N95, the N99 is five (5) times more efficient in preventing airborne particles from entering the breathing zone. The level of protection required in a particular workplace environment is a matter of policy regarding respiratory protection

It is important to note, that whereas the filter itself will provide certain protection efficiency (95%, 99% or 99.97%), there are other potential sources of particle inward leakage that can reduce a respirator's effectiveness. These include gaps between the respirator facepiece and the face (the "face-seal"), exhalation valves, and holes from staples and grommets that attach the elastic bands. Studies have shown that these other routes of inward leakage can allow as much as an additional 10% of airborne particles to enter into one's breathing zone. It is for this very reason that OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) regulates fit-testing requirements.

OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) mandates and enforces health and safety regulations in places of work (occupations). OSHA requires that all respirators be properly fit-tested using a quantitative or qualitative fit test when initially assigned to a user and at regular/stipulated intervals thereafter.

"Respirators that don't seal properly around the face offer only the illusion of protection"
Reference: OSHA Technical Manual, Section III
An integral and effective face-seal is extremely important, particularly with exposure to infectious pathogens such as viruses and bacteria. If the respirator facepiece does not seal properly to the face, then harmful airborne pathogens can enter the wearer's breathing zone. It is therefore essential to carefully follow the donning user instructions and to perform the user seal-check before entering any hazardous environment.

Fit testing is mandated by OSHA to ensure that the right brand/model/size respirator "fits" the wearer's facial contours. The individual wears the respirator and a trained practitioner administers the test; either qualitative or quantitative. The qualitative test is a pass/fail that relies on the individual tasting, or not, an administered ambient irritant such as isoamyl acetate(banana oil), smoke, or saccharin(Bitrex®). The quantitative test assesses the integrity of the fit(Faceseal) by measuring the ratio of an indicator outside and inside the facepiece. In both cases the individual undergoes numerous maneuvers that imitate work routines. The fit-test procedures are outlined in OSHA Fit-Testing Procedures - 1910.134 Appendix A. In

November 2008, the NPPTL and University of Minnesota School of Public Health sponsored a "No Fit Test" Respiratory Workshop which focused on the nature and process of product innovation and development in negative pressure half-piece respirators to gauge the current "state-of-the-art" and to stimulate new designs or approaches for improved respirator fit. This request for a "no fit respirator" is directly reflective of on-going and increasing user requests for more comfortable, easier to use, easier to fit, personal protective devices. The Fitseal™ adhesion respirator with its state-of-the-art material and innovative technology was presented at that workshop.

Yes. In the occupational setting, OSHA mandates that the employer must provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, and the ability to do the type of work which requires the respirator, before being fit-tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. It does not necessarily insist on examination by an MD. The 29 CFR 1910.134 stipulates that a "licensed healthcare professional" must perform the evaluation using the medical questionnaire contained in Appendix C, OR an examination by a physician that covers the same essentials. The regulation also requires ongoing medical surveillance.

Yes. In the U.S.A. and Canada, OSHA regulations mandate fit-testing. Fitseal™ is indeed unique, but to date is not yet exempt from fit-testing. Fitseal™ has been approved by NIOSH for one-size-fits-all; fitting a range of facial sizes and shapes from 1 to10 (one subject from each box of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) panel). As such, they will "fit" the vast majority of individuals on the first attempt, thereby reducing the time spent being fit tested or re-tested; simplifying inventories and supply chains; and ensure that the "right" respirator for that particular individual is available at point of need, when needed. Because Fitseal™ conforms to one's facial structure; it can successfully fit individuals who could not be fitted with conventional banded respirators.

The seal check is done by the wearer each and every time after donning a respirator in order to assure that the respirator is fully "sealed" to the face prior to entering a contaminated work area. The user seal check in and of itself does not obviate the fit-test outlined above.

The check consists of inhaling forcefully once the respirator is donned and seated in the optimal position.

Suction should be felt on the inside portion of the facepiece much like when sucking on an empty bottle.

The facepiece should partially indent/collapse from the resultant negative pressure thusly generated. If this is not achieved, then press firmly around the circumference of the Fitseal™ respirator to assure that the adhesive fully contact the face, and then repeat the seal check. Repeat the procedure until a proper seal is obtained.

If unsuccessful, then discard the respirator and take another.

The Fit Factor is a numerical measure of an aerosol challenge expressed as the ratio of the aerosol's concentration outside the respirator divided by the concentration that penetrated and leaked to the inside during the respirator fit-test procedure(s).

The APF is the level of protection that a particular type of respirator is expected to provide 95% of the time it is used.

An APF of 10 means that a properly fitted respirator can be safely used in an atmosphere that has a concentration of up to 10 times the PEL (Permissible Exposure Limit) for the particular hazardous agent. APF values are assigned by national (U.S.A.) standards organizations such as NIOSH and ANSI.

It is customary practice to use ten times the APF as the FF Pass Level when doing quantitative fit testing. The innovative Fitseal™ adhesion respirators exceed the minimum Pass Level requirements.

TIL is the measurement of all routes of particle penetration which include; through the filter material, through exhalation valves, staples and gaps between the respirator and the face (the face-seal).

"The inward leakage of a respirator is determined by measuring the concentration of a challenge aerosol outside of the respirator, as well as the concentration within the breathing zone. Respirator fit testing normally considers face-seal leakage. Total inward leakage defines a protective level achieved by a respirator when the contributions of all leakage paths are considered. The TIL is defined as the ratio of the external concentrations to the breathing-zone considered." (quoted from The NIOSH Total Inward Leakage Project, October 31, 2007 by Roland Berry Ann)

Pollens, molds, viruses, bacteria and other biological agents are particles that obey the same properties of aerosol physics as do non-biological particles. Airborne biological agents can be filtered by FFPR's with the same efficiency as are the non-biological particles. Unlike with industrial hazards however, there are no established exposure limits (PEL) for biological agents. The Fitseal™ respirators will definitely reduce, per its NIOSH rating, the wearer's inhalation of the harmful particles, but not to absolute zero.

The Fitseal™ respirators significantly reduce exposure, but do not eliminate all risks of infection. The Fitseal™ respirator was conceived during the SARS outbreaks, and was designed with infectious diseases in mind. It is the first and only adhesion FFPR to be approved by NIOSH under 42 CFR Part 84 and to have met the fit testing requirements for new technology.

The Fitseal™ respirators are effective, consistent with their respective NIOSH certification, against any and all particles. Some examples, but not limited to, are: viruses (SARS, smallpox, chicken pox), pollen, bacteria (TB, anthrax), molds (stachybotris), animal dander (cats), silica, asbestos, metallic dust/fumes, laboratory animal allergens (rats, hamsters), grain dust....

Yes. Any "flu" virus is a particle, and risk of exposure can be significantly reduced by wearing a respirator with an N95 level of protection or higher.

Yes. According to Ontario Regulations under the Occupational Health and Safety Act, as long as the concentrations are less than or equal to 10 fibres per cm3, a disposable filtering facepiece respirator can be used.

Yes. Air-purifying filtering facepiece particulate respirators approved by NIOSH under 42 CFR Part 84 with an N95 level of protection or higher meets the CDC filtration efficiency performance guidelines for M. Tuberculosis control.

Airborne particles that are considered respiratory hazards range in sizes between 0.01 -100 micrometers (µm). The Fitseal™ respirator have been tested and proven to filter out such particles at greater than 99.5% efficiency. The established standard for filtration (penetration) is based on testing with particles of 0.3 microns mass median aerodynamic diameter as per criteria in 42CFR Part 84. The particle diameter of 0.3 µm is used because it is the size most likely to penetrate the filter medium. Particles of both smaller and larger diameters will be trapped with even greater efficiency due to the respective electrostatic and mechanical properties of the filter.FFPR's certified by NIOSH can be used for all particulate respiratory hazards irrespective of size.

No. Fitseal™ respirators contain no latex and no natural rubber and are latex-free, fiberglass-free and hypoallergenic.

This innovative respirator design eliminates the need for straps and utilizes a medical-grade, hypo-allergenic and latex-free adhesive that is widely used in many medical applications. Extensive testing by leading specialists in dermatology at the Institute for Skin Research, Consumer Product Evaluation Branch, has shown that there is no evidence of trauma on the Stratum Corneum barrier, (the upper most layer of the skin) after repeated use. A slight redness or tingling sensation may be felt after removal. As noted in our User Instructions, the adhesive should not be placed over any form of visible dermatitis, scabs, acne or other facial skin infections, open wounds or sensitive skin.

All filtering facepiece respirators are disposable and for one time use only. The Fitseal™ respirator CAN be re-used in terms of its mechanical function; the filter will work and so will the adhesive. The question is not whether it "can" be re-used, but rather whether it "should" be re-used; and that is a matter of proper policy and good practice. It is up to the organization or the individual to make that decision. User seal-checks will confirm a good "face-seal" but obviously manufacturers cannot warranty such practices.